Stephanie Goldberg represents clients in all aspects of complex civil litigation, specializing in intellectual property, contract, and antitrust matters. With a background in engineering, Stephanie offers clients creative and effective solutions for their most difficult legal problems. She has experience representing clients in various forums, including federal and state courts, arbitration, and federal investigations.
As a registered patent attorney and former law clerk with the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, Stephanie has extensive knowledge and experience in patent law. While she mainly litigates patents in U.S. district courts, she also counsels clients in federal appellate proceedings and at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). Significantly, Stephanie helped author Google’s successful petition for rehearing en banc in EcoFactor, Inc. v. Google LLC, the Federal Circuit’s first en banc grant in a utility patent case since 2018.
Stephanie earned her law degree with honors from Georgetown University Law Center and her bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from Princeton University. Before joining Keker, Van Nest & Peters, Stephanie served as a law clerk to Judge Raymond T. Chen of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and to Judge Charles F. Lettow of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. Before law school, Stephanie worked in technology policy at Microsoft.
At Princeton, Stephanie played on the varsity field hockey team and won the NCAA Division I National Championship in 2012 and the Ivy League Championship four times. A proud Tiger alumna, she has served as an Alumni Class Officer since 2015.
Abbott Diabetes Care v. Dexcom
We defended Dexcom in the District of Delaware where Abbott asserted a dozen patents targeting Dexcom’s G6 continuous glucose monitoring technology. The Keker team narrowed the case to four patents prior to trial, including by invalidating an Abbott patent at summary judgment, and excluded Abbott’s expert testimony regarding reasonable royalty damages. Following a two-week trial, the jury invalidated another Abbott patent and found two were not infringed. The Court also declined to let the Jury consider damages on the remaining patent, cementing a defense victory for the Keker trial team.
Mickelson et al. v. PGA TOUR
We represent the PGA TOUR in an antitrust lawsuit filed by 11 professional golfers who left the PGA TOUR and joined LIV Golf. We defeated plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order seeking to force the PGA TOUR to allow them to play in the FedExCup Playoffs. We also recently won a motion to compel subpoena compliance from Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund and its Governor, Yasir Al-Rumayyan.
Broadcom v. Netflix
We are defending Netflix against a 12-patent case Broadcom filed in the Central District of California. We successfully transferred the case to the Northern District of California, where it is pending before Judge James Donato. We successfully obtained rulings dismissing six of the patents as abstract under Alice, with an additional patent invalidated during inter partes review proceedings before the PTAB. We are also defending Netflix against a separate 5-patent case originally brought by Broadcom in the Eastern District of Texas. A three-judge Federal Circuit panel ordered the district court to transfer the case to the Northern District of California where it is now proceeding before Judge Edward Chen. After the transfer, the firm achieved a stay of all district court proceedings pending inter partes review proceedings before the PTAB.
02/18/2025
Keker, Van Nest & Peters partners Bob Van Nest, Sharif Jacob, Sophie Hood and Ryan Wong reflect on the firm’s biggest trial wins which earned its place among Law360’s 2024 Trials Groups of the Year. Read more
03/22/2024
Law360 has reported that a Delaware federal jury has cleared Dexcom, represented by Keker, Van Nest & Peters, of infringing two glucose monitor patents owned by an Abbott Laboratories unit, while finding infringement of one that was not willful. It hung on a fourth. The trial was overseen by Third Circuit Judge Kent A. Jordan in the U.S. District of Delaware, who decided a second trial will be held to determine any damages. Read more
08/12/2022
Litigators at Keker, Van Nest & Peters land runners-up honors in the case they’re handling for the PGA Tour involving antitrust claims brought by suspended golfers who have joined the professional golf tour’s upstart rivals at the LIV Golf Invitational Series. Read more
08/09/2022
A federal judge in California ruled Tuesday that three golfers who joined Saudi-backed LIV Golf will not be able to compete in the PGA Tour’s postseason. Read more
Third Party Standing at the Federal Circuit: A Patent Challenge Disparity, Harv. J.L. & Tech. Dig. (2019)